Posted on October 7, 2007 at 11:49 am
To compare the ecstatic critical reception of the Donmar production of Parade that just opened to the considerably more reserved response nine years ago, you might think we’d started from scratch and overhauled the entire show. In fact, it’s pretty much the same piece it always was, except for the new happy ending where Leo and Mary tap dance into Heaven together.
I’m kidding, I’m kidding, it’s a samba.
Truly, though, if you only know Parade through the original cast album, you’ll maybe notice two or three changes. For those of you who’ve actually done the show, or have a photographic recall of the time you saw it, the show is really about 80-85% the same, but you’ll notice many of the differences, and I think you’ll agree with me that they’re all for the better. Here’s a basic summary of the changes we made, and why we made them:
1. It used to be an epic, now it’s a chamber piece. If we had done nothing to the show but agreed to let the Donmar cut down the size of the cast and orchestra, that alone would have been a substantial revision. I was hired by Hal Prince to write “an American opera,” and Alfred and Hal and I deliberately made the choice that Parade should be big. We opened at Lincoln Center with a cast of thirty-six and an orchestra of twenty. Because of the size of the Donmar (only 260 seats), there was no way to recreate the size of that production, and so we reduced the cast to fifteen and the orchestra to nine. (Even at those numbers, it’s the biggest show the Donmar have ever done.) Therefore, everything about the show is tighter, sharper, smaller, more aggressive. I’m not sure that always works in the show’s favor, but much of the time it certainly does. Inevitably, the focus of the show changed, and the most obvious respect in which the dynamic shifted is that the only two actors who don’t double or triple other parts are the actors playing Leo and Lucille. Therefore, we recognize them always as “other,” as “different.” Similarly, the importance of other characters diminished because they were being doubled and tripled: the actor who plays Governor Slaton also plays Britt Craig, for example, which makes you watch both of those characters differently. And which led us to…
2. Britt Craig is not the star of the show. When we started working on Parade in 1994, we made an outline that differed in many respects from the final production, not least of which was that Britt Craig, the reporter who broke the Leo Frank story, served as a narrator and the audience’s stand-in. We began writing the show by following the outline, which had a big introductory number for Britt called “Big News”. As we went on writing, Britt became less and less important to the storytelling, but we had given him such a big fabulous introduction that we felt obliged to keep him in the forefront of the narrative. This became particularly problematic in Act Two, where there really was nothing for him to do other than occasionally tell us about the way the rest of the world was reacting to the case. All along, I kept saying that the problem was that we hadn’t given Britt Craig enough to do after such a big introduction. In fact, the problem was the opposite: we shouldn’t have given Britt Craig such a big introduction because he just wasn’t important enough. So when Alfred and I sat down this spring to reassess the show, we decided to just cut “Big News” and let Britt Craig assume his natural tertiary position in the narrative. I’ve watched this production eight or nine times, and I’ve never missed it. Luckily, the song is preserved (with Evan Pappas’s marvelous performance and a truly awesome orchestration) on the original cast album.
3. Dorsey needed some help in Act Two. I always loved Act One because it set up such a grand panorama of characters and swung them into motion in what I thought was a very elegant way, but I felt like Act Two focussed so tightly on Leo and Lucille that we lost some of that panorama. (Audiences seemed to respond exactly the opposite way: they’d seem confused and overwhelmed throughout the first act, but sit riveted and engaged during the second.) As we trimmed down the show and tried to draw straighter lines for each of the characters, we realized that we did a great job in Act One of setting up Hugh Dorsey, the district attorney, but he disappeared in Act Two, and we missed him. Furthermore, we had a whole song given to Judge Roan, a character who nobody cared about and most people probably didn’t recognize. So we converted “Letter to the Governor” into an entirely new piece that would point up Dorsey’s political ambition and explain the undercurrent of fury that blows up during “Where Will You Stand When The Flood Comes?”. It’s now a great duet for the Judge and Dorsey called “The Glory.” In order to write the song, however, Alfred and I did have to change a bit of history (not for the first time in the creation of this piece): according to the books, Judge Roan did in fact write a letter on his deathbed to the Governor questioning the Frank verdict, and that letter convinced Slaton to re-open the case. According to our show in this new version, the Judge thinks it’s a mistake for Slaton to get mixed up in the Frank business, and he grooms Dorsey as a potential successor.
4. Goodbye Newt, Hello Minnie. All that doubling and tripling of characters had some wonderful effects on the play, but sometimes it worked against us. We had only one actor (the wonderful Shaun Escoffery) playing the three black men in the show, Jim Conley, Newt Lee and Riley, the Governor’s driver. What we discovered during the first readthrough was that Jim Conley overwhelmed everything else: when Shaun had to switch from Conley back to Newt, it was always a letdown for the audience to watch this actor subdue all of the charisma we’d just seen. At the same time, we were severely underutilizing an enormous asset: Malinda Parris, who plays the role of Angela, maid to the Slatons. Angela really only exists to sing “A Rumblin’ and a Rollin'”, but it was obvious Malinda could do much more than we were asking of her. So Alfred and I decided it was finally time to let Minnie McKnight take the stage. Minnie was the domestic who worked for Leo and Lucille Frank, and she had an interesting part in the case (she was coerced into signing an affadavit that was certainly partially responsible for Leo’s indictment); we also enjoyed the dynamics that would come from having an intimate member of the household testify against Leo. So we replaced all of Newt’s testimony in the trial and his reprise in Act Two with a new piece for Minnie McKnight. And now we love having Minnie in the show – I can’t imagine that she wasn’t there all along.
5. Fiddlin’ John, we hardly knew ye. Fiddlin’ John Carson is considered by some to be the first “country music” performer, but he’s important to the Leo Frank story because he wrote a song called “The Ballad of Little Mary Phagan” (you can listen to Moonshine Kate, his daughter, in her recording of the song here, but I’ll be amazed if you make it through more than a minute or so) which he performed on the steps of the courthouse as Leo was sentenced to death. People sang it for years afterward, and Southerners of a certain generation still remember Fiddlin’ John. However, as far as Parade was concerned, he was just one more goddamn person for the audience to keep track of, and so we decided that time could be better spent on a character who actually mattered to the plot: Tom Watson. So I wrote a new song called “Hammer Of Justice” for Watson to sing at the start of the trial, which replaces “People of Atlanta” and all of its reprises. It’s a really cool song, too.
6. The top of the second act. Again. Britt Craig’s pretty much out of the picture, so we couldn’t start the act with him. Instead, Alfred wrote a lovely scene for Governor Slaton and his wife Sallie which sets them up as important people to watch in Act Two, and I underscored the scene with an a cappella chorale led by Tom Watson. Then the servants come in to clean up the Slatons’ breakfast, and they go right into “A Rumblin’ and a Rollin’.” (We had to change that song a bit because it’s now a duet instead of a quartet.) All told, it’s the first time we’ve all been happy with the way the second act starts. Which is good, because we’re not revising this fucking show anymore.
You’ll be able to hear all these changes soon, because First Night Records is producing a new cast album for the show, which will be recorded on October 18 & 19 in London. I’m really excited about that, because it will give people a chance to hear the spectacular performances of this British cast as well as David Cullen’s magnificent new orchestrations. The cast album will also be a very important tool for people who want to produce the show, because starting in January 2008, the only version of Parade that will be available for license is this new one; we are withdrawing the earlier version, though we may make “Big News” available separately for those companies who have a Britt Craig that they really want to show off. Don Sebesky and I are also going to revise the original orchestrations so that you can do the show with the small band or the large one. [UPDATE 9/09: This turns out to have been a lie, though I do intend to make it true eventually. More details on my unwitting dissembly here.]
I hope you’ll get a chance to see the Donmar production, because it’s a really well-thought-out, gorgeously staged and beautifully cast version of the show, but I also want to say that I loved the original production just as much even though it was very different. I think some people will always resist a serious musical; you can read it in some of the reviews, that idea that it’s not appropriate to set this story to music. Obviously, I consider that a ridiculous response to this piece – either you’re moved by it or you’re not, but I tell stories with music, and this is the story we all decided to tell. It will always be a controversial show, and I imagine I’ll be defending it for the rest of my life, but there was nothing more satisfying than walking through the lobby at the Donmar several days after we opened and hearing audience members telling each other how moved, how involved, how surprised they were by the story being told, and how excited they were by the way we told it.
23 comments
The chamber piece version sounds great! I wish I could have an opportunity to see the Donmar production. I recall that when I saw the show at Lincoln Center, that giant tree overshadowed everything to the extent that the whole space felt unbalanced and wonky, emphasizing the height of the space and making the performers seemed somehow diminished. I’d love to see what a more intimate version would look like.
I agree, the smaller version makes the show truly accessible for many more groups but will the original still be available for rent/performance? For some larger groups the larger show may fit better.
Also, when does the new version become available for rent? Will there be some overlap in timeframe?
Looking forward to seeing this next Saturday (13th Oct). Can’t wait for the cast recording either!
Jon
(PS. Am I the only person who thinks Fiddlin’ John Carson sounds like Herbert from Family Guy?)
I cannot wait to hear the new recording as well. I saw the original at Lincoln Center and was moved by the difficult subject matter.
If anyone is interested in seeing a new production of PARADE, the University of Central Florida (UCF) is scheduled to produce it in the spring of 2008 on March 27-30 & April 3-6.
See you there!
This is a different Parade…the original was a big Broadway epic but the smaller Parade marches in double-time. The pace is so fast that there’s no time to applaud individual efforts. Asking the actors about it, they felt at first it was strange but grew to enjoy it. The absence of applause, except at the end of the first act and the show, doesn’t break up the continuity of the dramatic storyline. Still, it’s weird sitting in the audience and expecting to hear applause after a big number but instead getting continuing dialogue.
Hi Jason and all…
I went to see Parade at the Donmar on Saturday night. It was absolutely amazing – and that is probably an understatement! The cast is so talented, and the Donmar space is used so well. I’m already planning to see it again, so for anyone who can still get tickets my advice is go get them soon before it’s over. Just goes to show there’s hope for Musical Theatre in the UK after all!
Congratulations to everyone involved in the production, especially Lara and Bertie!
Very interesting to read about the changes you folks made… while we’re in the middle of rehearsing to put up the original version. Sounds like ours will be one of the last with that book. Hoping to do it proud.- jb
The Donmar production is AMAZING! I only knew the show from the original cast recording, so to see it staged was always going to be a thrill. The smaller cast does indeed make the show more accessible, and because the Donmar is so small you get to see every nuance. I will never forget the look on Lara Pulver’s face (as Lucille) during the court room scene when she realises she is sat next to Mrs. Phagan. Huge credit to all at the Donmar for streamlining the piece in such a brilliant way. Also JRB says he didn’t have much to do with this production, but all those rewrites and reworkings add so much to the production. Let’s hope this Parade goes on and on (although not at the Donmar as it’s a limited run)!
Wow, I just want to say I can only imagine how amazing the revisions must be because the original is stunning as is. There is something very moving and beautiful about this story and I thank you for having the courage to take something so touching and serious and turning it into a lovely piece of art. I have the honor to be playing Lucille right now in a production in Nashua NH, and I can only say that it is the most amazing experience. I feel so connected to her and only wish I knew her in person. Without your masterpiece, I and others would probably never have known about this tragic story that unfortunately still has resonance today. You are a beautiful artist and thank you for all that you have graced the world with. I will hold this and Lucille in my heart forever. Good luck with the updated version, I’m sure it is amazing.
Wow. I’m surprised by all the changes, but I know just by reading them that it’ll make Parade a stronger and better show, and hopefully one that is performed more often. However, the fact that I got to work on one of the relatively few productions (the most recent one in Boston) of the old version will always make me sentimental, especially because I like “People of Atlanta” a lot. And “Big News” because it’s a bit of comedy. But I’m very excited to hear the new recording!
I am a huge fan, and I think it’s wonderful how well-received the new version has been. However, I think it’s a big mistake to withdraw the earlier version and make it unproduceable, because although most people may choose the new one, the American followers of Parade have already fallen in love with the first one, the one we saw. That’s our Parade, and I would personally be sad if I never had the opportunity to perform in the show I fell in love with.
However, you’re the writer and I respect that, but that is my strong opinion–I believe you should leave us with a choice. Congratulations on the success of your new productions, can’t wait to see what’s next.
Is it too late to work in a memorable solo by Detective J N Starnes?
FROM JRB: You’re joking, but actually, in this production, the actor playing Starnes also plays Tom Watson, so he now gets plenty of time in the spotlight.
Mr. Brown,
I can’t wait to hear all the revisions of the show, as I can’t get myself to the Donmar to see it, which is disappointing, but I’m sadly not rich!
I’m SURE that this new version will be absolutely fantastic, and is really thought out!
I am writing to say, though, that I’m kind of disappointed that you’re pulling the OLD version of the show available to license. I happen to love the grandness of the old version, and I actually REALLY like some of the characters you’ve cut (Fiddlin’ John being one of them, because if I remember correctly, doesn’t he have some really nifty stuff in the group scenes?)
So I am actually pretty sad you won’t get a choice as to which version you’re getting. Any chance you’ll let both versions be available?
I saw it this afternoon . . . gorgeous.
I like the revisions a lot (although I do miss the Judge’s song). I can’t wait for the new recording.
Well done on a marvellous show.
I’m really excited about these changes too, as they all seem pretty beneficial (or at least, not harmful), but I want to echo those who are pleading to at least make both versions available. There’s no reason why a bigger theatre that’s not double casting can’t have a Newt and a Jim Conley, or why directors who do want to focus on the panoramic aspects can’t use “People of Atlanta” and “Letter to the Governor” to widen the scope of the piece (since that was part of the original intention).
I am so excited to see the Donmar production while I’m here in London! I am curious to see the changes that have been made in action especially after having played Mary in New Rochelle High School’s production of the show last spring! Congrats on the opening!
I have been working with Western Illinois University’s production of Parade and I have loved every minute. I helped with costumes and I also ran the light board for the show and I can’t wait to see and hear this other new version. I am a little disappointed that Craig has been taken out but I understand why!
I have recently returned from the Edinburgh Festival where I was lucky enough to see all of JRB’s productions: Songs for a New World (X2) and The Last Five Years. I love his work – but nothing I had seen or heard before prepared me for Parade at the Donmar! This is the best production I have seen in the West End in 20 years! Congratulations to all concerned – I will be at the front of the queue to get another recording of this masterpiece!
I have seen the West End production of Parade twice now and just think it is a beautiful gem of a show. Adrenaline is not always something you connect with this kind of production but I had so many moments where I just had such a rush of emotions. I have to say there is no point in any musical that gets me as much as the cast of fifteen breaking into the chorus of the last “Old Red Hills of Home” completely a cappella, beause I knew the OCR well I was taken aback and blown away by how emotional that moment is.
Also loved the doubling up of parts as it just made me see some characters in a totally new light!
I hope that one day I will be so lucky as to be a part of a production of Parade somewhere! TH
The Donmar production is excellent, and thank you for finally bringing the West End a worthy production of this brilliant piece. However, if I may be so bold, I don’t think all the changes worked; for instance, the original material for the opening of the trial was better and didn’t need to be replaced (just perhaps a slight re-write of lyrics) if you’d used Tom Watson as the dominant voice instead of Fiddlin’ John. The scaling down of the cast and orchestra was necessary because of the space, but cutting a lot of the extra vocals in the opening scenes and trial was a shame, because there was never a feeling or physical/vocal implication (just a mention) of the actual Memorial Day Parade. And whilst the great new orchestrations help change the scale of the piece, the mix is very quiet and the piano no longer leads the score in the way that it used to. Was this deliberate? Considering the piano drives the score so well, it seemed a shame to lose it so much.
However these small ciriticisms come from someone who is not being disrespectful, but just so loves the piece that some of the changes just felt unnecessary – not that they spoiled a polished, superbly produced and performed piece of theatre. Congratulations!
I am quite disappointed that I won’t be able to get to London for the show, but formal words cannot express how excited I was to hear about the changes, and that there is going to be a new recording.
Being a student of the case for many months and a self-proclaimed Leo Frank nerd, I was glad to hear that Minola McKnight makes an appearance. Her character and role in the case has always interested me. All of the other changes – and even that slight historical inconsistency that irked me slightly, but prompted the entertainment-business side of me to say, “Nah, it works – ” sound like great ideas and that they have made for a sharper show. Excited to hear what it all sounds like.
I’ll tell you though, JRB, your first Broadway cast of Parade was a blessing, indeed. Carolee and Evan – and of course – how can we forget Canada’s Theatre King, Brent Carver? I was fortunate enough to see him in The Elephant Man a week ago.
In fact, I brought along the insert from my Parade CD and it is very much signed by him.
I could have had him sign the program, but I brought Parade instead. A stage door veteran, I am still unable to speak intelligently out there – or I would have explained better why I chose to have him sign that instead.
Who knows? Maybe that will go away. I’m quite an up-and-coming writer – I might have a show hit the bigtime soon. We might work together. Would that not be ironic?
Back in the present. Glad the new show turned out the way you dreamed, even if it’s become a bit of a nightmare revising it so. As always, a big fan. Look forward to hearing the new album.
Pray for that West End transfer!
Best Regards,
Meredith
I just wanted to chime in and say how much I enjoyed seeing this production at the Donmar Warehouse. Having never seen the Broadway production, but having listened to the cast recording often, I have to say that this show really is a piece of art. I saw the show here in London tonight and I was on an emotional rollercoaster the entire time. The acting and singing was phenomenal, and the space really does lend itself to the piece. More than anything, however, I felt that this production truly brought out the artistry of your music. When the music dropped away in the final reprise of “Old Red Hills of Home,” the breath literally caught in my throat and I was practically in tears. As someone who once lived in Atlanta, I feel that both the rich history/pride and the cultural hypocrisy were well represented and created a truly dynamic, touching piece of work. Everyone involved should be proud. It was by far one of the best theatre experiences I’ve had.
Wow, these changes sound brilliant! I loved the original version, of course, but these sound like extremely smart developments. Certainly it’s a major refinement of the way the story unfolds to the audience. Any talk of bringing this production to the US?
The comments are closed.